Operating Method

Agentic work is useful only when the control boundary is explicit.

High-context implementation, review, modernization, and automation work can move quickly, but candidate output still needs specification, interrogation, verification, and a handoff path before it becomes durable behavior.

Automation Model

Two kinds of automation, separate responsibilities.

Agentic work is useful for ambiguous, high-context tasks. Deterministic work is useful when the same rule must behave the same way every time. The specification decides when output graduates from candidate work into controlled behavior.

Concern
Agentic automation
Deterministic automation
Control boundary
Purpose
Agentic automationExplore, draft, implement, critique, and recover missing cases.
Deterministic automationExecute declared rules, transformations, checks, and code paths.
Control boundaryThe spec states what may be attempted, trusted, or rejected.
Outputs
Agentic automationCandidate code, findings, alternatives, tests, and review notes.
Deterministic automationCompiled behavior, generated source, validators, jobs, and records.
Control boundaryCandidate output must pass review before it becomes durable behavior.
Failure mode
Agentic automationPlausible but wrong, incomplete, overconfident, or mis-scoped.
Deterministic automationConsistently wrong when the contract or rule is wrong.
Control boundaryCorrectness passes, tests, and operator review catch drift before release.
Best use
Agentic automationHigh-context implementation, review, refactoring, and discovery work.
Deterministic automationStable transformations, validations, integrations, and repeatable business logic.
Control boundaryWhen repeatability matters, convert the decision into a deterministic contract.

Operating Loop

The automation layer is a loop, not a shortened checklist.

The sequence preserves the correction path. Agentic implementation is not treated as final work; it is challenged, verified, corrected, and converted into deterministic assets when the workflow needs stable behavior.

  1. Specification

    Capture purpose, workflow state, inputs, outputs, constraints, intended behavior, forbidden behavior, acceptance criteria, and failure handling.

    feeds
  2. AI implementation

    Generate the first implementation, tests, adapters, or review artifacts with the specification in scope.

    questions
  3. Interrogation

    Challenge the implementation for mismatches, hidden assumptions, edge cases, missing tests, and places where the code outruns the spec.

    proves
  4. Verification

    Use human inspection, tests, fixtures, logs, acceptance checks, and operational examples to decide whether the artifact actually satisfies the spec.

    corrects
  5. Deterministic contract

    For behavior that must repeat, define the schema, state machine, validation rule, template, generator, API shape, or transformation contract.

    checks
  6. Feedback

    Operational findings, user friction, defects, and new constraints return to the written specification before the next pass begins.

Standards

What must stay legible after delivery.

The finished system should not depend on the memory of the build process. Important behavior needs explicit state, boundaries, records, and recovery paths.

State model
Lifecycle, transitions, validations, retries, cancellations, corrections, and terminal states are visible enough to reason about.
Authority model
Users, roles, services, and agents have declared permissions for drafting, approving, blocking, escalating, and modifying records.
Evidence record
Important actions retain relevant inputs, diffs, checks, approvals, errors, and outcome context without burying operators in noise.
Recovery path
Failed imports, bad generated output, rejected approvals, partial jobs, and human corrections have a known path forward.
Maintainability
Code, contracts, tests, deployment steps, and handoff notes remain understandable when the original implementation context is gone.